Meth Injuries: Statistics from a level I trauma center

In a report published by the Journal of Trauma that compares meth related injuries to injuries related to other illicit drugs – meth came out the clear “winner”.

Meth’s impact on a level I trauma center.
Study done by: Division of Trauma, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.

BACKGROUND:
Methamphetamine (METH) use is associated with high-risk behavior and serious injury. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of METH use in trauma patients on a Level I trauma center to guide prevention efforts.

METHODS: A retrospective registry-based review of 4,932 consecutive trauma patients who underwent toxicology screening at our center during a 3-year period (2003-2005). This sample represented 76% of all trauma patients seen during this interval.

RESULTS: From the first half of 2003 to the second half of 2005, overall use of Meth increased 70%, surpassing marijuana as the most common illicit drug used by the trauma population. Other illicit drug use did not significantly change during this interval.

Meth positive patients were more likely to have a violent mechanism of injury
(47.3% vs. 26.3%)

  • 33% more assaults (p < 0.01)
  • 96% more gunshot wounds (p < 0.001)
  • 158% more stab wounds (p < 0.001)
  • Meth positive patients were more likely to have attempted suicide
    (4.8% vs. 2.6%, p < 0.01)
    Meth positive patients were more likely to have had an altercation with law enforcement
    (1.8% vs. 0.3%, p < 0.001)
    Meth positive patients were more likely have been the victim of domestic violence
    (4.4% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001)

    Meth users had a higher mean Injury Severity Score
    (11.2 vs. 10.0, p < 0.01)

  • Meth users were 62% more likely to receive mechanical ventilation (p < 0.001)
  • Meth users were 53% more likely to undergo an operation (p < 0.001)
  • Meth users were more prone to leave against medical advice (4.9% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001)
  • Meth users were 113% more likely to die from their injuries (6.4% vs. 3.0%, p < 0.001)
  • The average cost of care per METH user was 9% higher than that for nonusers, and METH users were more likely to be unfunded than nonusers (47.6% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001). The annual uncompensated cost of care of METH users increased 70% during the study period to $1,477,108 in 2005.

    CONCLUSION: METH use in trauma patients increased significantly and was associated with adverse outcomes and a significant financial burden on our trauma center. Evidence-based prevention efforts must be a priority for trauma centers to help stop the scourge of METH.

    Popularity: 3% [?]

    Related posts:

  • Nurses report a rise in violent meth patients

  • Short Term vs. Long Term Effects of Meth

  • Baby Dies Due to Meth Laden Q-tip

  • Crystal meth makes you crazy

  • Making meth? Don’t piss off your neighbors


  • Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically each day to your feed reader. If you don't have a feed reader, you can always have these articles delivered to your email inbox every day. Click here to sign up.

    blog comments powered by Disqus